19th SOLEIL USERS' MEETING - SUM2025

Survey

Survey – SOLEIL Users’ Meeting 2025

General Information

1. How did you learn about this meeting? (select one or more)*

Attended previous SOLEIL events

SOLEIL email communication

SOLEIL website

Other

If you have selected other

2. Which of the following were important when deciding to attend? (select one or more)*

Invited speaker

Registration cost

Tutorials

Parallel sessions

Parallel sessions on technic / methodology

Other

If you have selected other

3. Please specify if you were registered as*

Regular participant

Invited speaker

Student

SOLEIL Staff

Exhibitors

Evaluation of the plenary sessions

4. The plenary session was (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

5. The posters session was (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

6. Please indicate here any additional suggestions for the round table or/and aspects from SOLEIL you would like to be presented (as the work of the high pressure group for instance).

Evaluation of the parallel sessions

7. Which scientific parallel session(s) did you attend? (select one or more)*

Biology and Health

Chemistry & Soft Matter (Characterization of structure and properties of chemical materials, reactivity, catalysis, chemical surfaces and interfaces / Soft matter)

Diluted matter

Geosciences / Environment / Cultural Heritage

Physics & Advanced Materials (Structural, electronic and magnetic properties of matter / Physical surfaces and interfaces)

8. The scientific parallel sessions were (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

9. The distribution of the scientific communities among the different parallel sessions was reorganized this year. Do you think the distribution should be maintained like that next year?

Yes

No

Comments:

10. Which parallel session(s) on technic / methodology did you attend? (select one or more)*

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (soft / tender / Hard X-ray)

Imaging / Microscopy / Tomography

Photoelectron Spectroscopies

Diffraction & Scattering / Coherence

Network for Students & Postdocs

11. The technic / methodological parallel sessions were (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

12. As a new part of the program, do you think such sessions dedicated to methodology/technic and gathering different scientific communities should be maintained for the next SUM?

Yes

No

Comments:

Evaluation of the workshops and satellite

13. Did you attend*

The Satellite – The new CryoEM

The Tutorial 1 – The latest developments of Fastosh

The Tutorial 2 – Surface diffraction - Data treatment and analysis

None

14. Please indicate any suggestions on topics for technical workshops, tutorials or satellite meetings.

General evaluation

15. Did the meeting live up to your expectations? (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

16. Overall evaluation of the meeting (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

17. The organizational aspects were (select only one)*

Excellent

Very good

Adequate

Poor

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

18. If you have attended previous SOLEIL Users’ Meetings, how did this compare (select only one)*

Better

Equivalent

Worse

I don't know

Comments:

19. Please indicate here any additional comments on logistics or ease of registration, or any other meeting related issues

20. Please indicate here any additional suggestions for the next SUM

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.